請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/22047
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 華筱玲(Hsiao-Lin Hwa) | |
dc.contributor.author | Jin-Yang Sie | en |
dc.contributor.author | 謝進洋 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T03:59:41Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2018-08-30 | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2018-08-10 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 一、中文部分
王美懿 (2009)。身為家庭暴力加害人處遇計畫的 身為家庭暴力加害人處遇計畫的「加害人」─一個解釋性互動論的研究。高雄醫學大學醫學社會學與社會工作學研究所碩士論文,179-183。 王燦槐(2006)。台灣性侵害受害者之創傷理論、內涵與服務。台北:學富。 王燦槐 (2001)。性侵害受害者之創傷反應在司法程序中被採用之內涵研究。內政部委託研究計畫期末報告,41-43。 王麗容 (2012)。內政部家庭暴力及性侵害防治委員會託研究報告:我國性別 暴力現況調查之研究,16-17。 內政部家庭暴力及性侵害防治委員會 (2017)。我國2005年至2016年之性侵害事件通報案件即通報單位通報件數比例。 民間正義聯盟團體(2010)。925白玫瑰運動活動內容概要。正義聯盟官方新聞網。 何春蕤 (1995)。性騷擾與性歧。視婦女新知,162:20-22。 宋宥賢 (2015)。臺灣地區性侵害加害人團體心理治療?涵與成效概況之探究。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊,101-124。 李品儀 (2014) 。白玫瑰運動之研究~從情感、社會運動與法律修正之角度切入。國立成功大學法律學系碩士論文,106-111。 沈勝昂(2006)。性侵害犯罪加害人的社區監督。性侵害犯罪防治學─理論與臨床實務應用,354-395。(2008)。性侵害犯罪加害人動態再犯危險評估量表之建立:動態危險因素之探測。(2009)。性侵害犯罪加害人社區處遇:理論政策與實務。 吳正坤 (2009) 。論性侵害案犯罪原因與矯治對策之探討,28-29。 范芯華 (2013) 。女性主義vs 多元文化。女性主義與自由主義,222-212。 李復國 (1997) 。 測謊技術之理論與實際。律師雜誌,208 : 47 以下。 林志潔 (2016)。性侵害案件無罪原因分析之研究──以強制性交案件為中心:47-62。 林故廷、邱俊智 (1997)。測謊理論之應用及其限制,刑事科學, 44 , 頁 37 以下。 林佩諭、翁德怡、華筱玲 (2012) Prevalence of Substance-Involved Sexual Assault in the Northern, Middle and Southern Parts of Taiwan 台灣法醫藉由酒精與藥物引起的性侵害犯罪之實證調查。 學誌 ,4:4 - 11以下。 林婉婷 (2009)。性侵害犯處遇之現況與未來發展。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊,205-222。 林鈺雄(2013)。嚴格證明法則之新紀元,最高法院刑事裁判評釋。元旦,39-69。 法務部法務統計分析。2006 年至 2011 年各地方法院檢察署辦理性侵害案件統計。各地方法院檢察署辦理性侵害案件再犯率統計。2011年至 2015 年各主要罪名起訴比率與定罪率統計分析,1-2。 法務部矯正署 (2017)。性侵害少年加人司法處遇業務專案報告。 美國聯邦法院 (2016)。Statistics Table for the Federal Judicial, United States Court, http://www.uscourts.gov/statistics-reports/analysis-reports. 施雅甄 (2011)。臺灣地區社會變遷與犯罪趨勢關聯性之研究。 陳昱如、周愫嫻 (2016)。從兒童性侵害案件看兒童性同意權與證述能力。刑事政策與犯罪研究論文集,19:201-202。 陳美燕(2005)。青少年性侵害加害人處遇之法律困境研究~以臺灣高雄少年法院為例。 陳慈幸、陳毓琪 (2008)。從戀童症與家庭系統理論論日本新潟少女囚禁案件。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵期刊,4:48-63。 陳若璋 (2012)。心理師的新角色:台灣司法心理師之專業內涵與發展困境。中華心理衛生學刊 : 25 1 – 252。。 陳慧女、盧鴻文 (2007) 。男性遭受性侵害之問題初探社區發展季刊 ,120:252-264。 陳毓琪 (2009) 。女性性侵害犯罪人的生命歷程與類型。碩士論文。 翁景惠、高 一書 (2003)。 測謊在我國法院使用之實證研究,國立台灣大學法學論叢,32: 149-207。 黃富源 ( 1982 )。犯罪黑數之研究。中央警官學校。警政學報創刊號,37:331-350。(2005)。我國性犯罪現況與防治對策之分析。國家政策季刊,4:69-99。 鄭怡世 (2002)。兒童性侵害加害者處遇原則之探討-認知行為治療與因應理論之運用。臺大社會工作學刊,6:89-122。 華筱玲、沈瓊桃 (2014)。論兒童性侵害案件驗傷採證和詢問工作。司法周刊,2-3。 趙千慧、許華孚 (2009)。亂倫父親認知扭曲之研究。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊,5:43-70. 葉致芬 (2010) 。性犯罪青少年之諮商介入策略初探。諮商與輔導,292,9-12。 蔡德輝、楊士隆 (2000)。台灣地區少年強姦犯、非暴力犯及一般少年犯罪危險因子之比較研究。犯罪學期刊第五期。中華民國犯罪學學會。 蔡德輝、楊士隆 (2004)。犯罪學,五南。 衛生福利部統計處 (2017)。性侵害事件通報案件統計。(2018)。性侵害事件通報加害人性別統計(按季別及區域分)。性侵害事件通報被害人籍別統計(按季別及區域分)。性侵害事件通報被害人教育統計(按季別及區域分)。性侵害事件通報被害人職業統計(按季別及區域分)。 衛生福利部保護司 (2018)。性侵害案件被害人年齡與性別。性侵害案件各籍別被害人數。性侵害案件被害人年齡與兩造關係。性侵害案件被害人身心障礙者人數及比例。性侵害案件被害人兩造關係(按季別及區域分)。 謝文彥、許春金、陳玉書、蔡田木、施雅甄 (2005)。台灣地區犯罪未來趨 向之研究。內政部警政署刑事警察局委託研究報告。 盧秀虹 (2005) 。論測謊之證據能力與證明力,國防管理學院法律研究所碩士論文。 羅秀雄、錢政銘、羅英瑛 (2001)。法醫學。高雄市:大夫。 二、英文部分 Abbey A, Ross LT, Mcduffie D, Mcauslan P (1996) Alcohol and dating risk factors for sexual assault among college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly 20:147-169. Adams JA, Harper K, Knudson S, Revilla J(1994)Examination findings in legally confirmed child sexual abuse: It's normal to be normal. Pediatrics 94: 310-317. Adams JA (2011) Medical evaluation of suspected child sexual abuse: 2011 update. J Child Sex Abus. 20:588-605. Adams JA, Kellogg ND, Farst KJ, Harper NS, Palusci VJ, Frasier LD, Levitt CJ, Shapiro RA, Moles RL, Starling SP (2016) Updated Guidelines for the medical assessment and care of children who may have been sexually abused. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology 29:81-87. Avegno J, Mills TJ, Mills LD. (2009) Sexual assault victims in the emergency department : analysis by demographic and event characteristics. J Emerg Med 37:328-334. Bachman (1993) The victim-offender relationship does affect victims' decisions to report sexual assaults crim. Criminal Justice and Behavior 20:271-279. Bachman (1998) The Factors Related to Rape Reporting Behavior and Arrest New Evidence from the National Crime Victimization Survey. Criminal Justice and Behavior 25:8-29. Baker AW, Duncan SP. (1985) Child sexual abuse: a study of prevalence in Great Britain. Child Abuse Negect 9:457-67. Berenson AB, Chacko MR, Wiemann CM, Mishaw CO, Friedrich WN, Grady JJ (2000) A case-control study of anatomic changes resulting from sexual abuse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 182:820-831. Bernd H, Sibylle B, Roland C, Francesca N, Reinhard D (2014) Physical examination in child sexual abuse approaches and current evidence Dtsch Arztebl Int. 111:692–703. Boyd NJ, Hagana M, Choa ME (2000) Aggression and violent behavior characteristics of adolescent sex offenders: A review of the research. Aggression and Violent Behavior 5:137-146. Breslau N, Chilcoat HD, Kessler RC, Davis GC (1999) Previous exposure to trauma and PTSD effects of subsequent trauma: results from the Detroit Area Survey of Trauma. Am J Psychiatry. 156:902-907. Browne A, Finkelhor D. (1986). Impact of child sexual abuse: A review of the research. Psychological Bulletin 99:66-77. Casey EA, Nurius PS (2006) Trends in the Prevalence and Characteristics of Sexual Violence: A Cohort Analysis. Violence and Victims 21:629-644. Cashwell CS, Caruso ME (1997) Adolescent sex offenders:Identification and intervention strategies. Journal of Mental Health Counseling 19:336-348. Christian CW, Lavelle JM, De Jong AR, Loiselle J, Brenner L, Joffe M. (2000) Forensic evidence findings in prepubertal victims of sexual assault. Pediatrics. 106:100-104. Caputo AA, Frick PJ, Brodsky SL (1999) Family violence and sex offending: the potential mediating role of psychopathic traits and negative attitude toward women. Criminal Justice and Behavior 26:338-356. Emans SJ, Woods ER, Allred EN, Grace E (1994) Hymenal findings in adolescent women: Impact of tampon use and consensual sexual activity. The Journal of Pediatrics 125:153-160. Farrington M, Foliano J, Graham DLR, Hacker R, Ihms E, Latimer D (1995) A scale for identifying “Stockholm syndrome” reactions in young dating women: Factor structure, reliability, and validity. Violence and Victims 10:3- 22. FBI (1988) Uniform Crime Reports: Crime in the United States. Fehman S, Norris J (1984) Differences Between Rape Victims Who Report and Those Who Do Not Report to a Public Agency. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 14:562-573. Finkelhor D, Hotaling G, Lewis IA, Smith C. (1990) Sexual abuse in a national survey of adult men and women: prevalence, characteristics, and risk factors. Child Abuse Neglect 14:19-28. Formuth ME, Burkhart BR(1987)Long-term psychological correlates of childhood sexual abuse in two samples of college men. Child Abuse Neglect 13:533-542. Fritz GS, Wagner NN (1981) A comparison of males and females who were sexually molested as children. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy 7:54-59. Furey EM (1994). Sexual abuse of adults with mental retardation: Who and where. Mental Retardation,32:173-180. Gachnochi G, Skurnik N (1992) The paradoxical effects of hostage-taking. International Social Science Journal 44:235-246. Gary D. LaFree (1980) The Effect of Sexual Stratification By Race on Official Reactions to Rape. American Sociological Review 45:842-854. Geffner RA, Crumpton Franey K, Falconer R. (2003) Adult sexual offenders:current issues and future directions. J Child Sex Abus. 12:1-16. George LK, Winfield L, Blazer DG (1992) Socio-cultural factors in sexual assault:Comparison of two representative samples of women. Journal of Social Issues, 48:105-125. Gidycz CA, Koss MP (1991) The effect of acquaintance rape on female victims. Acquaintance rape: The hidden crime:270-283. Girardet RG, Lahoti S, Howard LA, Fajman NN, Sawyer MK, Driebe EM, Lee F, Sautter RL, Greenwald E, Beck-Sagué CM, Hammerschlag MR, Black CM (2009) Epidemiology of sexually transmitted infections in suspected child victims of sexual assault. Pediatrics 124:79-86. Granoff BJ, Mills CS (1992) Date acquaintance rape among a sample of college students. Social Work 37:504-509. Hanson RK, Gordon A, Harris AJ, Marques JK, Murphy W, Quinsey VL, Seto MC (2002) First report of the collaborative outcome data project on the effectiveness of psychological treatment for sex offenders. Sex Abuse 14:169-94. Harvey MR, Herman JL (1992). The trauma of sexual victimization: Feminist contributions to theory, research, and practice. PTSD Research Quarterly 3:1- 3. Heger A, Ticson L, Velasquez O, Bernier R (2002) Children referred for possible sexual abuse: medical findings in 2384 children. Child Abuse & Neglect 26:645-659. Heger A, McConnell G, Ticson L, Guerra L, Lister J, Zaragoza T (2003) Healing patterns in anogenital injuries: a longitudinal study of injuries associated with sexual abuse, accidental injuries, or genital surgery in the preadolescent child. Pediatrics 112:829-837. Hwa HL, Chen HC, Wu MZ, Shun CT, Liu SK, Lee JC, Chen YC (2010) Analysis of case of sexual assault presenting at a medical center in taipei.Taiwan Obstet Gynecol. 49:165-169. Hymel KP, Jenny C (1996) Child sexual abuse. Pediatr Rev.17:236-249. Ira S and Deborah B (2011) The Influence of Forensic Evidence on the Case Outcomes of Rape Incidents The Justice System Journal 32:314-334 Jaycox LH, Zoellner L, Foa EB J (2002) Cognitive-behavior therapy for PTSD in rape survivors.Clin Psychol. 58:891-906. Johnson CF (2004) Child sexual abuse. Lancet 364:462-470. Johnson D, Peterson J, Sommers I, Baskin D (2012). Use of forensic science in investigating crimes of sexual violence: Contrasting its theoretical potential with empirical realities. Violence Against Women 18:193-222. Kellogg ND, Menard SW, Santos A (2004) Genital anatomy in pregnant adolescents: 'normal' does not mean 'nothing happened'. Pediatrics. 113:67-9. Kellogg ND, Parra JM, Menard S. (1998) Children with anogenital symptoms and signs referred for sexual abuse evaluations. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 152:634-641. Kercher GA, McShane M (1984) The prevalence of child sexual abuse victimization in an adult sample of Texas residents. Child Abuse Neglect 8:495-501. Kessler RC, Chiu WT, Demler O, Merikangas KR, Walters EE. (2005) Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry 62:617-627. Kessler RC, Sonnega A, Bromet E, Hughes M, Nelson CB (1995) Posttraumatic stress disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry 52:1048-1060. Koss MP (1985) The Hidden Rape Victim: Personality, Attitudinal, and Situational Characteristics. Psychology of Women Quarterly 9:193 - 212. Koss MP (1992) The underdetection of rape: Methodological choices influence incidence estimates. Journal of Social Issues 48:61-75. Koss MP (2000) Blame, shame, and community: Justice responses to violence against women. American Psychologist 55:1332-1343. Koss MP, Leonard E, Beezley DA, Oros CJ (1985) Nonstranger sexual aggression: A discriminant analysis of the psychological characteristics of undetected offenders. Sex Roles 12:981–992. Kruttschnitt C (1994) Gender and interpersonal violence. In A. J. Reiss, Jr., J. A. Roth (Eds.) & National Research Council, Understanding and preventing violence. Social influences 3:293-376. Lawyer S, Resnick H, Bakanic V, Burkett T, Kilpatrick D (2010) Forcible, drug-facilitated, and incapacitated rape and sexual assault among undergraduate women. Journal of American College Health 58:453-60. Lisak D, Luster L. (1994) Educational, occupational, and relationship histories of men who were sexually and/or physically abused as children. J Trauma Stress. 7:507-523. Mansell S, Sobsey D, Moskal R (1998) Clinical findings among sexually abused children with and without developmental disabilities. Mental Retardation 36:12-22. Margaret J, Janice DM, Terri L, Myhr M (2002) Sexual assault forensic medical examination: Is evidence related to successful prosecution?Annals of Emergency Medicine 39:639-647. Martin PY (2006) Rape Work: Victims, Gender, and Emotions in Organization and Community. Community Development Journal 41: 255-257. Masho SW, Ahmed G (2007) Age at sexual assault and posttraumatic stress disorder among women: prevalence, correlates, and implications for prevention. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 16:262-271. McCann J, Miyamoto S, Boyle C, Rogers K (2007) Healing of hymenal injuries in prepubertal and adolescent girls: a descriptive study. Pediatrics 119:1094-1106. Nazer D, Palusci VJ (2008) Child sexual abuse: can anatomy explain the presentation? Clin Pediatric s 47:7-14. Nicholas B, Joanne JP, Lorne D, Meaghan (2011) Testimonial Support Provisions for Children and Vulnerable Adults: Case Law Review and Perceptions of the Judiciary Government of Canada. Robin W, Paul J (2008) Genetic Policing: The use of DNA in criminal investigations. Genetic Policing: the use of DNA in criminal investigations. The British Journal of Criminology 48:699-701. Russell, DEH (1982) The prevalence and incidence of forcible rape and attempted rape of females. Victimology: An International Journal 7:81-93. Schlagenhauf P (2003) UNICEF report documents sexual exploitation of children. Lancet 362:1556-1580. Arch Gen Psychiatry 52:1048-1060. Shaqiri E, Shahu G, Xhemali B, Vyshka G (2018) Traits of vulnerability in repetitive sexual assaults of mentally disabled people. Med Leg J. 86:80-83. Siegel JM, Sorenson SB, Stein JA, Golding JM, Burnam MA (1987) The prevalence of childhood sexual assault: The Los Angeles epidemiologic catchment area project. American Journal of Epidemiology 126:1154-64. Sorenson SB, Siegel, JM (1992) Gender, ethnicity, and sexual assault: Findings from a Los Angeles study. Journal of Social Issues 48:93-104. Testa M, Livingston JA, Vanzile TC, Frone MR (2003) The role of women's substance use in vulnerability to forcible and incapacitated rape. J Stud Alcohol. 64:756-764. Thackeray JD, Hornor G, Benzinger EA, Scribano PV (2011) Forensic evidence collection and DNA identification in acute child sexual assault. Pediatrics 128:227. Theodore AD, Chang JJ (2005) Epidemiologic features of the physical and sexual maltreatment of children in the Carolinas. Pediatrics 115:331-337. Tjaden P, Thoennes N. (1998) Stalking in America: Findings From the National Violence Against Women. Survey:1-20. Tjaden P, Thoennes N (2009) Prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: national violence against women survey, Researchin Brief. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice. NCJ 172837. Underwood LA, Robinson SB, Mosholder E, Warren KM. (2008). Sex offender care for adolescents in secure care: Critical factors and counseling strategies. Clinical Psychology Review. 28:917-932. Warshaw R (1994) I never called it rape. Australian Feminist Law Journal 30: 109-129. WHO (2002) World Report on Violence and Health. WHO WHO (2017) Responding to children and adolescents who have been sexually abused WHO publishes new guidelines. WHO. Wolak J, Finkelhor D, Mitchell KJ, Ybarra ML (2008) Online 'predators' and their victims: myths, realities, and implications for prevention and treatment. Am Psychol. 63:111-128. Young KL, Jones JG, Worthington T, Simpson P, Casey PH (2006) Forensic laboratory evidence in sexually abused children and adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 160:585-8. Yehuda R (2002) Post-traumatic stress disorder. New England Journal of Medicine 346 :108-114. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/22047 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 性侵害案件在各國皆是重要的犯罪議題,鑑於目前我國性侵害的定罪率與法醫學證據的相關性研究數據缺乏,本研究從終審確定判決書,評估性犯罪與法醫學證據收集結果,由審判實例中分析法醫證據在判決書中的呈現與影響判決情形,研究目的是分析台灣不同性侵害型態的判決與法醫學證據力的關係,以期有助於提昇法醫師與司法人員專業能力及保障性侵害受害者人權與維護司法正義。
本研究方法為應用民國89-107年終審判決有罪案件判決書與判決無罪案件判決書,分析各項偵查證據(包括測謊、攝錄、社群媒體紀錄)與法醫學證據(包括一般身體傷及肛陰部或口腔傷痕及DNA人別鑑定結果) 被判決書引用及闡述的結果。本研究收集177件有罪判決案件與18件無罪判決案件,其中有罪比例90.8%。全部案件中被害人以女性佔多數(95.9%),未成年佔 (48.2%),多為本國國籍(94.9%),有易受傷性者 (智能障礙及精神疾患) 佔12.8%,加害人以男性佔多數(97.6%),性侵害使用武器加害的情形佔 6.7%,檢測有酒精者佔12.8%,有鎮靜安眠藥者佔6.7%,有DNA鑑定者佔9.2%,判決書有引用驗傷診斷書者為56份,其中被害人有肛陰部傷害者在有罪判決為43.8%,在無罪判決為62.5%,一般身體部位之傷害在有罪判決為60.4%,在無罪判決為 100%,罹患創傷後壓力症候群在有罪判決為10.2%,在無罪判決為5.6%。本研究未能呈現法醫學證據與判決有顯著相關性。 期望未來有更多關於各項偵查證據與法醫學證據被判決書援引及闡述結果分析的研究,提升國家司法公平正義。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Sexual assault cases is an important crime issues in all countries. Given there is little academic research that has examined the contribution of forensic evidence to criminal justice outcomes in Taiwan, we analyzed the final judgement from 2000 to 2018 year, and evaluated how investigation evidence (including polygraph, video recording, social media records) and forensic evidence (including anogenital and general body injuries as well as DNA profiles) influence the judgment in the court.
We collected the verdicts of 177 convictions and 18 acquittals, of which 90.8% are guilty. Among these cases, the majority of victims were female (95.9%), 48.2% were under 18 years old , 94.9% were Taiwanese, and 12.8% were vulnerable persons (intellectual disability and mental disorders). The majority of assailants were male (97.6%). The weapons usage occurred in 6.7% of the cases. Alcohol involved cases accounted for 12.8%, and hypnotics involved cases accounted for 6.7%. Those with DNA identification accounted for 9.2%. Among the 56 verdicts with physical examination reports, anogenital injuries were documented in 43.8% and 62.5% of guilty verdict cases and acquittal cases, respectively. General body injuries were documented in 60.4 % and 100% of quilty verdict cases and acquittal cases, respectively. Posttraumatic stress disorder were noted in 10.2% and 5.6% of guilty verdict cases and acquittal cases, respectively. There was no association between prescence of forensic evidence and guilty verdict. We expect there will be further research for the influcence of the investigation and forensic evidence to judgment in the future. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T03:59:41Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-107-R05452004-1.pdf: 1163848 bytes, checksum: 6bf01c44e34826da8a62f4fcc1bdcc0c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
中文摘要 I Abstract II 圖目錄 IV 表目錄 V 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 前言 1 第二節 研究背景 1 第三節 研究動機 4 第四節 研究目的 4 第二章 實驗材料與方法 6 第一節 材料來源與實驗設計 6 第二節 研究架構 6 第三節 研究流程 6 第三章 研究結果 8 第一節 性侵害案件司法判決案例統計 8 第二節 性侵害案件被害人基本資料統計 8 第三節 加害人基本資料統計 10 第四節 易受傷性 (Vulnerability) 11 第五節 犯案情況 11 第六節 偵查證據結果統計 12 第七節 實驗鑑驗結果統計 12 第八節 傷痕鑑驗結果統計 13 第四章 討論 15 第一節 研究結果討論 15 第二節 被害者特性 15 第三節 加害人特性 17 第四節 犯案情況 18 第五節 檢驗結果 20 第六節 診斷書 23 第五章 研究限制 26 第六章 結論與建議 27 附錄 45 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 台灣性侵害案件判決與法醫學證據的關聯性分析 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Analysis of the association between conviction of sexual assault cases and forensic evidence in Taiwan | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 106-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 許福生(Fu-Sheng Xu),韋愛梅(Ai-Mei Wei) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 性侵害,法醫學證據,判決書,傷痕,人別鑑定, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Sexual assault,Forensic evidence,Injury,Judgment, | en |
dc.relation.page | 56 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201802842 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2018-08-10 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 法醫學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 法醫學科所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-107-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.14 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。