請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/20587
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 谷玲玲(Lin-Lin Ku) | |
dc.contributor.author | Syuan-Cheng Lin | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林軒正 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T02:54:20Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2020-09-03 | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2020-08-22 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 丁興祥(1991)。《社會心理學》。新北市:國立空中大學。 王郁琇(2006)。《單親父親之親職實踐》。世新大學性別研究所碩士論文。 王定洋(2014)。〈新住民子女學習表現優異之家庭教養與學校生活適應之研究-以花蓮縣玉里鎮田野國小為例〉,《臺東大學人文學報》,(4),33-75。 王碧君(2015)。〈新住民及其子女的教養問題與改善建議〉,《台灣教育》, (695),21-28。 王俊忠(2017)。〈台灣出生率全球最低 醫師:台灣重大危機〉,《自由時報》。取自:http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/2014484 朱崑中(1997)。《青少年所知覺的親子溝通與其自我觀念、生活適應之相關研究》。彰化師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。 行政院主計處(2007)。《95年社會發展趨勢調查報告:家庭生活》。取自:https://reurl.cc/kd1vrn 行政院國家發展委員會(2017)。《106年新住民數位機會現況與需求調查報》。取自:https://reurl.cc/L3mD4y 李鴻瑛(2006)。《外籍配偶國小子女親子溝通與親子關係之研究》。高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。 李明哲(2006)。〈從女性影像探討個人電腦的居家化:以《PC home》雜誌廣告為分析對象〉。《台灣社會研究季刊》,(57)。 沈孟燕(2009)。《親情Online:網路媒介與家庭溝通型態之相關研究》。政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。 邱清泰(1979)。〈從夫妻溝通看親子溝通方法〉,《張老師月刊》,(3),50-52。 邱珍琬(2014)。〈新住民的親職實踐-一個初探研究〉。《家庭教育雙月刊》, (52),6-25。 吳就君(1986)。《家庭動力學》。臺北市:大洋。 吳金香、張茂源、王昇泰(2007)。〈從兒童學習權觀點談「新住民子女」的教育問題〉。《學校行政》,(50),269-281。 吳瓊洳、蔡明昌(2017)。〈新住民雙重文化認同與生活適應之研究〉,《嘉大教育研究學刊》,(39),1-32。 呂玉瑕、伊慶春(2005)。〈社會變遷中的夫妻資源與家務分工:台灣70年代與90年代社會文化脈絡的比較〉,《台灣社會學》,10:41-94。 呂傑華、李明軒(2014)。〈花蓮地區大學生網際網路溝通行為與社會資本網絡關係之研究〉,《慈濟大學人文社會科學學刊》,(16),129-164。 林聚任、王鵬、宋麗君譯(2009)。《互動儀式鍊》。北京:商務印書館。(原書:Collins, Randal (2004). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.) 周談輝(2012)。《人際關係與溝通》。新北市:全華。 胡榮、王小章譯(1995)。《心靈、自我與社會:從社會行為主義者的觀點出發》。台北市:桂冠。(原書:G. H. Mead (1934). Mind, self and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.) 夏曉鵑、宋長青和釋自淳(2000)。〈外籍新娘識字班官方版流於形式〉,《中國時報》,第15版。 夏曉鵑(2000)。〈資本國際化下的國際婚姻市場:以台灣外籍媳婦為例〉,《臺灣大學社會系研討會刊》,(1)。 馬傳鎮(1982)。〈少年犯的親子關係、家長社經地位、家庭背景與學校背景之調查研究〉,《教育與心理研究》,(5),177-224。 陳富美、利翠珊(2004)。〈夫妻的育兒經驗:親職分工與共親職的探討〉,《中華心理衛生學刊》,17(4):1-28。 陳柏安、林宜蓁、陳蓉萱譯(2006)。《傳播理論》。台北市:五南。(Griffin, E. A. (2003). A first look at communication theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, Inc.) 陳志萍(2011)。〈影音分享網站YouTube上的另類性別反串扮演〉,《性別平等教育季刊》,(55),130-137。 陳信佑(2016)。《行動即時通訊與親子關係維繫:以臺灣遠距家庭為例》。臺灣大學新聞研究所碩士論文。 郭美娟、陳若琳(2012)。〈雙薪家庭幼兒父親的親職效能,母親的教養鼓勵與父職參與之相關研究〉,《家庭教育與諮商學刊》,13:57-79。 翁麗芳(2009)。〈新住民家庭子女教養的需求與回應-臺北縣的幼小銜接嘗試〉,《臺灣圖書館管理季刊》,(5),1-25。 徐西森、連廷嘉、陳仙子、劉雅瑩(2002)。《人際關係的理論與實務》。台北市:心理。 婦女新知基金會(2003)。〈不要叫我外籍新娘!〉,婦女新知基金會記者會新聞稿。取自:https://www.awakening.org.tw/topic/2045 許峯源(2015)。《跨國做家庭-傳播科技的性別政治》。政治大學新聞所碩士論文。 張晉芬、李奕慧(2007)。〈「女人的家事」、「男人的家事」:家事分工性別化的持續與解釋〉,《人文及社會科學集刊》,19(2):203-229。 教育部統計處(2018年6月)。《106學年度新住民子女就讀國中小人數分布概況統計》。取自:https://reurl.cc/0opnvY 曾惟農(2009)。《跨國移工傳播權初探-以台灣東南亞籍移工為例》。交通大學傳播研究所碩士論文。 黃春枝(1986)。〈青少年親子關係適應與父母管教態度之研究〉,《教育與心理研究》,(9),83-96。 黃素妹(2009)。〈親子溝通及其介入策略〉,《家庭教育雙月刊》,(21)。 黃厚銘、曹家榮(2015)。〈「流動的」手機-液態現代性的時空架構與群己關係〉,《新聞學研究》,(124),39-81。 黃曉琪(2016)。《父親與青年子女使用行動即時通訊軟體的溝通模式初探》。政治大學傳播研究所未出版碩士論文。 彭德富(2007)。〈族群歧視與人權政策—以東南亞外籍配偶為例〉,《止善學報》,(3),87-103。 鄭文進(2017)。〈新北市新住民新娘概況〉,《數據分析》,(12),27-34。 蔡玲雪(2005)。《外籍及大陸配偶家庭子女之親子關係、師生關係及其生活適應之關係研究-以台南市為例》。台南大學輔導教學研究所碩士論文。 蔡旻軒(2015)。《資通訊科技應用服務對親子關係之影響-以南部某大學為例》。成功大學電信管理研究所碩士論文。 賴保禎(1972)。《父母管教態度測驗》。臺北市:中國行為科學社。 賴明政、陳佳君(2016)。〈行動通訊應用軟體的溝通特質對親子關係維持與家庭滿意之影響〉,《東吳經濟商學學報》,(93),53-91。 謝秀芬(1986)。《家庭與家庭服務》。臺北:五南。 謝文全(1998)。《教育行政-理論與實務》。臺北市:文景。 Ashford, S. J. Northcraft, G. B. (1992). Conveying more (or less) than we realize: The role of impression management in feedback seeking. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 53, 310-334. Baldwin, A. L., Kalhoun, J., Breese, F. H. (1945). Pattern of parent behavior. Psychological Monographs, 58(3), 86-105. Blumer, H. (1969) ‘The Methodological Position of Symbolic Interactionism’, in Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; reprinted (1998) by University of California Press, Berkeley. Bolino, M. C., Kacmar, M. K., Turnley, W. H. Gilstrap, B. J. (2008). A multi-level review of impression management motives and behaviors. Journal of Management, 34(6), 1080-1109. Bolino, M. C. Turnley, W. H. (2003). More than one way to make an impression: exploring profiles of impression management. Journal of Management, 29(2), 141-160. Bozeman, D. P. Kacmar, K. M. (1997). A cybernetic model of impression management processes in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 9-30. Braun, M., Lewin-Epstein, N., Stier, H., Baumgärtner, M. K. (2008). Perceived equity in the gendered division of household labor. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70(5), 1145-1156. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. London: Routledge. Cabanes, J. V. A., Acedera, K. A. F. (2012). Of mobile phones and mother-fathers: Calls, text messages, and conjugal power relations in mother-away Filipino families. New Media Society, 14(6), 916-930. Carlson, J. R., Zmud, R. W. (1999). Channel Expansion Theory and the Experiential Nature of Media Richness Perceptions. Academy of Management Journal, 42, pp. 53-171. Chayko, M. (2008). Portable communities: The social dynamics of online and mobile connectedness. New York, NY: SUNY Press. Christensen, T. H. (2009). ''Connected presence'' in distributed family life. New Media Society, 11(3), 433-451. Crosswhite, J. M., Rice, D., Asay, S. M. (2014). Texting among United States young adults: An exploratory study on texting and its use within families. The Social Science Journal, 51(1), 70-78. Daft, R. L., Lengel, R.H., Trevino, L. K. (1987). Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: Implications for information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11(3), pp. 355-366. Dennis, A. R., Kinney, S. T., Hung, Y. C. (1999). Gender differences in the effects of media richness. Small Group Research, 30(4), pp. 405-437. Devitt, K., Roker, D. (2009). The role of mobile phones in family communication. Children Society, 23(3), 189-202. Elder, G. H. (1962). Structural variations in the child-rearing relationship. Sociometry, 25, 241-262. Francisco, V. (2013). ''The Internet is Magic'': Technology, intimacy and transnational families. Critical Sociology, 0(0), 1-18. Flanagin Metzger (2007). Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2078-2091 Fokkema, T., Bekke, S. T., Dykstra, P. A. (2008). Solidarity between parents and their adult children in Europe. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press. Forste, R., Fox, K. (2012). Household labor, gender roles, and family satisfaction: A cross-national comparison. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 43(5), 613-631. Ganito, C. (2010). Women on the move: the mobile phone as a gender technology. Comunicação Cultura, 9, 77-88. Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Penguin Books. Green, E., Adam, A. (1998). On-line leisure: gender and ICTs in the horn. Information. Communication Society, 1(3), 291-312. Habid, L., Cornford, T. (2002). Computers in the home: domestication and gender. Information Technology People, 15(2),159-174. Haddon, L. (2004). Information and communication technologies in everyday life. Oxford, UK: Berg. Hawkins, A. J., Christiansen, S. L., Sargent, K. P., Hill, E. J. (1993). Rethinking fathers'' involvement in child care: A developmental perspective. Journal of Family Issues, 14(4), 531-549. Horst, H. A. (2006). The blessings and burdens of communication: Cell phones in 93 Jamaican transnational social fields. Global Networks, 6(2), 143-159. Hurlock, E. B. (1978). Child Development (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Palan (1998). Relationships between family communication and consumer activities of adolescent: An exploratory study. Journal of Marketing Science 26(4),338-349. Johnson, G. J., Bruner II, G. C., Kumar, A. (2006). Interactivity and its facets revisited. Journal of Advertising, 35(4), pp. 35-52. Jones, E. E. Pittman, T. S. (1982). Toward a general theory of strategic self- presentation. In J. Suls(Eds.), Psychological perspectives on the self (pp. 231-262). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Kamal, F. M., Noor, N. L. M., Baharin, H. (2014, June). “Presence in Absence”: Distributed family communication practices for familial bonding via mobile communication technology. Paper presented at the 16th international conference on human-computer interaction, Crete, Greece. Kang, T. (2012). Gendered media, changing intimacy: Internet-mediated transnational communication in the family sphere. Media, Culture Society, 34(2), 146- 161. Kanter, M., Afifi, T., Robbins, S. (2012). The impact of parents “friending” their young adult child on Facebook on perceptions of parental privacy invasions and parent–child relationship quality. Journal of Communication, 62(5), 900-917. Kelly L., Keaten J. A. (2007). Development of the affect for communication channels scale. Journal of Communication, 57, pp. 349-365. Lee, S. J. (2009),” Online communication and adolescent social ties: Who benefits more from internet use?” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, No.3, pp.509-531. Ling, R., Yttri, B. (2002). Hyper-coordination via mobiles phones in Norway. In J. E. Katz M. A. Aakhus (Eds.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 139-169). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Madianou, M. (2012). Migration and the accentuated ambivalence of motherhood: The role of ICTs in Filipino transnational families. Global Networks, 12(3), 277-295. Madianou, M., Miller, D. (2012). Migration and new media: Transnational families and polymedia. New York, NY: Routledge. Malik, S., Kadir, S. Z. (2011, December). The use of mobile phone and Internet in transnational mothering among migrant domestic workers in Singapore. Paper presented at the Communication Policy Research South, Bangkok, Thailand. McBride, B. A., Brown, G. L., Bost, K. K., Shin, N., Vaughn, B. Korth, B. (2005). Paternal identity, maternal gatekeeping, and father involvement. Family Relations, 54(3), 360-372. Mochas, G.P. (1985). The role of family communication in consumer socialization of children and adolescent. Journal of Consumer Research, 11,898-913. Murdock, G., Harrmann, P., Gray, P. (1995). The politics of domestic consumption: Critical reading. London: Prentice Hall/Harvester Wheatsheaf. Nardi, B. A., Whittaker, S., Bradner, E. (2000). Interaction and outeraction: instant messaging in action. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 79-88). New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.: Association for Computing Machinery. Newhagen Rafaeli (1996). Why communication researchers should study the Internet: a dialogue. Journal of Communication, 46, 4-13. Olson, D. H., Russell, C., Sprenkl, D. (1 983). Circumplex Model VI: Theoretical Update. Family Process, 18, pp. 3-28. Parreñas, R. S. (2001). Mothering from a distance: Emotions, gender, and intergenerational relations in Filipino transnational families. Feminist Studies, 27(2), 361-390. Parreñas, R. S. (2005). Children of global migration: Transnational families and gendered woes. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Parreñas, R. S. (2008). Transnational fathering: Gendered conflicts, distant disciplining, and emotional gaps. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 34(7), 1057-1072. Rabby, M. K. (2007). Relational Maintenance and the Influence of Commitment in Online and Offline Relationships. Communication Studies, 58, pp. 315-337. Rainie, L., A. Lenhart, S. Fox, T. Spooner, and J. Horrigan (2000), “Tracking Online Life Pew Internet American Life Project Retrieved” 2009.5.9, from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2000/ Tracking-Online-Life.aspx Rakow, L., Navarro, V. (1993). Remote mothering and the parallel shift: Women meet the cellular telephone. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 20(3), 144-157. Roy, K. M., Dyson, O. L. (2005). Gatekeeping in context: Babymama drama and the involvement of incarcerated fathers. Fathering, 3(3), 289-310. Schon, J. (2014). “Dad doesn’t text” examining how parents’ use of information communication technologies influences satisfaction among emerging adult children. Emerging Adulthood, 2(4), 304-312. Silverstone, R., Haddon, L. (1996). Communication by design: The politics of information and communication technologies. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Silverstone, R. (1999). Society on the line: Information politics in the digital age. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Stair, V.M. (1972). People making. Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books. 74. Turel, O., A. Serenko, and N. Bontis (2008), “Mobile Instant Addiction: Symptoms and Outcomes.” AMCIS 2008 Proceedings. Vancea, M., Olivera, N. (2013). E-migrant women in Catalonia: Mobile phone use and maintenance of family relationships. Gender, Technology and Development, 17(2), 179-203. Walther, J. B., (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relationship perspective. Communication Research,19,52-90. Wilding, R. (2006). ‘Virtual’ intimacies? Families communicating across transnational contexts. Global Networks, 6(2), 125-142. Williams, E., Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. 97 London, UK: John Wiley Sons. Williams, A. L., Merten, M. J. (2011). iFamily: Internet and social media technology in the family context. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 40(2), 150-170. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/20587 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 新住民家庭因行動即時通訊(MIM)與LINE的普及,使親子溝通產生變化。筆者透過深度訪談法,針對20組受訪家庭梳理出下列研究結果。
首先,MIM溝通樣貌相當多元。多數受訪者認為MIM為FTF的延伸,部分受訪者覺得MIM與FTF並無太大差異,重點是訊息內容。另外,MIM使得溝通中人可以藉由忽略訊息而逃避互動,父母也能透過MIM來監控子女。其次,MIM造成性別化溝通。女性擅用貼圖與分享軟性文章,帶動對話氛圍,與男性不同,並間接轉化男性對於性別角色的傳統認知。然而,MIM與LINE也使得新住民家庭能更坦然的討論歧視問題。再者,MIM溝通策略兼具理性與感性兩種特色。依照不同的溝通情境,子女會選擇不同屬性的溝通策略與父母互動。最後,新住民家庭親子溝通因MIM產生質變。除了親職分工與性別認知的轉化外,MIM使得新住民家庭感受到永恆聯繫的珍貴連結,也更重視科技居家化的溝通訊息意義。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The spread of MIM and LINE in new immigrants’ families has changed parent-child communication. Through in-depth interviews of 20 families, the research results are shown as follow.
First, MIM communication is quite diverse. Most interviewees think that MIM is an extension of FTF, and some interviewees feel that MIM and FTF are not too different. The focus is on the content of the message. In addition, MIM allows people in communication to avoid interaction by ignoring messages, and parents can monitor their children through MIM. Second, MIM creates gendered communication. Women are good at using stickers and sharing soft articles to promote a dialogue atmosphere, which is different from men, and indirectly transforms men’s traditional cognition of gender roles. However, MIM and LINE enable new immigrants’ families to discuss discrimination issues more frankly. Furthermore, MIM communication strategy has both rational and perceptual characteristics. According to different communication situations, children will choose communication strategies of different attributes to interact with their parents. Finally, parent-child communication among new immigrants’ families has undergone a qualitative change due to MIM. In addition to the division of labor and the transformation of gender cognition, MIM enables new immigrants’ families to feel the precious connection of eternal connection, and also pay more attention to the meaning of communication and information of technology domestication. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T02:54:20Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-2008202014293400.pdf: 2058115 bytes, checksum: 18b7f67f38fb67ef9ba0c40f8acc927b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
致謝----------------------------------------------------------------------------I 中文摘要-----------------------------------------------------------------------II 英文摘要----------------------------------------------------------------------III 目錄---------------------------------------------------------------------------IV 表目錄-------------------------------------------------------------------------VI 第一章 緒論---------------------------------------------------------------------1 第一節 研究動機------------------------------------------------------------------1 第二節 研究背景------------------------------------------------------------------2 第三節 研究目的------------------------------------------------------------------8 第二章 文獻探討------------------------------------------------------------------9 第一節 親子關係與溝通-------------------------------------------------------------9 第二節 行動即時通訊下的親子溝通特性------------------------------------------------21 第三節 永恆聯繫與科技居家化-------------------------------------------------------35 第四節 研究問題-----------------------------------------------------------------39 第三章 研究方法-----------------------------------------------------------------40 第一節 事前研究個案探討與說明-----------------------------------------------------40 第二節 資料蒐集方法-------------------------------------------------------------44 第四章 研究結果-----------------------------------------------------------------50 第一節 親子關係與溝通------------------------------------------------------------50 第二節 行動即時通訊下的親子溝通特性------------------------------------------------71 第三節 永恆聯繫與科技居家化-------------------------------------------------------77 第五章 研究結論與建議------------------------------------------------------------84 第一節 研究發現與討論------------------------------------------------------------84 第二節 研究限制與建議------------------------------------------------------------91 第三節 未來研究方向-------------------------------------------------------------92 參考文獻-----------------------------------------------------------------------94 附錄--------------------------------------------------------------------------104 附錄一:子女版訪綱(一)---------------------------------------------------------104 附錄二:父母版訪綱(二)---------------------------------------------------------106 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 「LINE」進生命中:新住民家庭使用行動即時通訊之親子溝通研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | LINE in Life: Parent-Child Communication via MIM in New Immigrant Families | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 108-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 柯舜智(Shuen-Chih Ko),秦琍琍(Li-Li Chin) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 新住民家庭,行動即時通訊,親子溝通,性別化溝通,歧視,溝通策略,親職分工,永恆聯繫,科技居家化, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | New Immigrant Family,Mobile Instant Messaging,Parent-Child Communication,Genderized Communication,Discrimination,Communication Strategies,Parental Division of Labor,Eternal Connection,Technology Domestication, | en |
dc.relation.page | 107 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202004134 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2020-08-24 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 新聞研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 新聞研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
U0001-2008202014293400.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.01 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。